The Propaganda Report (episode 9): The Grand Finale

Downloadable Audio

Click Here To Subscribe To The Propaganda Report On iTunes. This helps us improve our visibility. Thank you!

For Android Users,
Click Here To Subscribe To The Propaganda Report On Google Play

Subscribe to Monica’s Blog Here

Subscribe To Brad’s Youtube Page Here

Convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s Lolita Express finally lands onto the news cycle, James Comey could be protecting Hillary Clinton, The dangerous divisive propaganda of identity politics, Just who’s watching the watchers, and Trump Batman Theory revisted…..all on this 9th episode of the propaganda report.

“The elites aren’t superhuman.”

“I’ve known tons of illegal immigrants who voted.”

Sandyhook footage used during the reporting of the Umpqua Community College Shooting, as mentioned. Pause it at the .16 mark and you can see the “Sandy Hook School” sign in the shot.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1ed_1444392717

Fake Die Hard 5 Movie Trailer as mentioned:

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TNqEJczNf4g?enablejsapi=1&autoplay=0&cc_load_policy=0&iv_load_policy=1&loop=0&modestbranding=0&rel=1&showinfo=1&playsinline=0&autohide=2&theme=dark&color=red&wmode=opaque&vq=&controls=2&]

Additional Show Notes….

Read moreThe Propaganda Report (episode 9): The Grand Finale

The Propaganda Report: Coercive Engineered Migration Qaddafi-Style

311235_402302646502911_892774958_n

Last year I added a glossary entry “coercive engineered migration” about a phenomenon described in Kelly Greenhill’s book, Weapons of Mass Migration, in which she uses as her best example Qaddafi threatening Europe with uncontrolled migration from Africa if they didn’t comply with his demands.

The theory behind coercive engineered migration is that relatively weak foreign rulers can effect policy change in democratic Western countries by forcing politicians to make a choice: either capitulate to their demands or be faced with a choice to either accept a flood of migrants or to refuse migrants and expose your country and its citizens as hypocrites. It was a very effective tactic and now, having bombed Libya into the stone age and set up Qaddafi to be killed, the West is using his tactic against its own people.

From charging European countries exorbitant fines upward of $300,000 per migrant refused, to threatening uncontrolled African migration if Libya is not taken in hand, the ruling elite of the EU and the US are, by hook or by crook, getting Europe to consent to participating in the military conquest of the Middle East.

Here is today’s propaganda from The Wall Street Journal: Arm our version of a government in Libya or be overrun…

U.S. and Others Open to Arming Libyan Government
Secretary of State John Kerry and top diplomats meet in Vienna to discuss anti-Islamic State measures

The Vienna meeting was co-chaired by Italy, Libya’s former colonial ruler, which is concerned about the country’s stability because of the threat of uncontrolled migration. Libya’s Mediterranean coast is a main departure point for migrants to southern Europe.

My distinction between recognizing the free exercise of the rights to work and travel and calling out coercive engineered migration has drawn some fire from libertarians, and I understand why, but one of my arguments for resisting this tactic is that the more effective it is the more it gives the powers that be–and even the powers that wanna-be–an incentive to continue to use it by destabilizing regimes from within through radical Islamic fifth columns and economic destabilization and without through mercenaries and military action.

To me, it is an inescapable conclusion that radical Islam and the migrant crisis are tools being used by the global military industrial complex for the subjugation of the Middle East. What else would explain the West’s policy of toppling secular Arab strongmen who kept radical Islam in check? The pattern is undeniable, from Qaddafi to Hussein to Assad in recent memory, to the mid-Twentieth century regime changes of the secular governments of Iran and Afghanistan. (Am I missing any? Oh yeah–using the Muslim Brotherhood against Nasser in Egypt and against Assad père in Homs, though those attempts at regime change were unsuccessful.)

 

 

They’re Coming To Get You!!!! Podcast of December 19, 2015 Show

chris-christie-claims-weight-problem-caused-by-global-warming-e1384283274661Hour 1

Hour 2

I wasn’t the only one who picked up on the insane fear-mongering of Chris Christie! Here’s the SNL cold open aired a few hours after my show…

Conan O’Brien media prank

Operation Mockingbird

Hugh Hewitt asks Ben Carson to promise to kill thousands of innocent children

The Remnant

Crazy picture of dead San Bernardino suspect w/ raw wrists under handcuffs–CAUTION, EXTREMELY GRAPHIC! EXTREMELY!!

They're Coming To Get You!!!! Podcast of December 19, 2015 Show

chris-christie-claims-weight-problem-caused-by-global-warming-e1384283274661Hour 1

Hour 2

I wasn’t the only one who picked up on the insane fear-mongering of Chris Christie! Here’s the SNL cold open aired a few hours after my show…

Conan O’Brien media prank
Operation Mockingbird
Hugh Hewitt asks Ben Carson to promise to kill thousands of innocent children
The Remnant
Crazy picture of dead San Bernardino suspect w/ raw wrists under handcuffs–CAUTION, EXTREMELY GRAPHIC! EXTREMELY!!

Coercive Engineered Migration

I recently wrote an article called The Libertarian Immigration Conundrum in which I discuss how the state can use our principles of liberty to get us to lose control of government and end up with less free societies. I hadn’t realized that this was a defined strategy until I saw the video below. The video is an excellent overview of the state of affairs in Europe today, and I’m more than intrigued by the reference made to Kelly Greenhill’s book, Weapons of Mass Migration. I haven’t read it yet, but the blurb is promising.

Defending an individual’s rights to work and travel is an essential element of libertarianism, but when governments destroy each other to change the fabric of society to benefit themselves at the expense of all of the populations, what is a libertarian to do?  The rights to work and travel are based on free will, not coercion, deception and military force. These are not free people responding to demographic or technological changes or even to a wanderlust, these are people deliberately displaced into populations that are not organically drawing them in.

Another question I’ve been considering as a libertarian concerns the immediate question of whether we should invite Syrian refugees by the thousands or even millions (what would be the fair number at which to stop?) to the United States as a result of the current crisis. My question is: does accommodating these refugees solve a problem created by our government against our will and insulate them from the consequences of their illegal and immoral behavior. The citizens of the United States made it very clear two years ago that we did not want John Kerry and Barack Obama to send Tomahawk missiles into Damascus Syria. We did not want war. They prosecuted the war anyway, however surreptitiously, and created a horrendous crisis. If we the people accept responsibility for this crisis, does this further enable our lawless leaders to continue this deadly and destructive behavior, or do we need to make it clear they are acting without our consent by repudiating their actions and all responsibility for their consequences?

In addition to discussing coercive engineered migration, Gearoid O Colmain gives in this video a very lucid overview of the major forces at work in the world today. (h/t American Everyman)

Don’t like the term “financial capitalism?” See my recent post Captive Institutions.