for main show notes and other formats click here
First time on since the presidential election…is it too soon to go back down the rabbit hole? What do you expect from President Trump? What do you fear?
It took me about 24 hours to completely dismiss the idea that Trump’s victory was a victory for “the people” who managed to defeat the highly controlled media and election process. That’s not to say there isn’t a paradigm shift in how I see the world, there is: seems like there are indeed two factions in the upper echelon (if not the uppermost echelon); there is more of an element of responsiveness to the zeitgeist of the masses than I had realized (though this in itself may be a sophisticated manipulation, but it’s based on an inherent recognition that the zeitgeist must be controlled or obeyed); and there may be a major shift in strategy and tactics to get us to the world government that I am still convinced is on the agenda. The false flags and psy ops are obvious, but the path from these ham-handed mechanisms to the end game are more subtle and sophisticated and harder to see. In an effort to peel yet more layers of the onion than I had previously realized existed, I have come upon a few websites that were way ahead of this outcome, or at least were onto something bigger.
Here they are:
As for my pre-election disposition, I was 100% convinced Hillary was the chosen one–just could not see around that because I believed she would be the one capable of silencing the anti-war left for the final invasions of the Middle East. But there were two things I failed to realize:
The first–that Hillary might not have been able to control her faction even with media support–would be a paradigm-shifter for me in that I believed after Obamacare was foisted upon us and then Obama was re-elected anyway while the Tea Party and the Liberty Movement were subverted, meant that we would eat anything we were fed. This might not be true.
The second point makes me kick myself because that, along with several other red flags, was something I had noticed and talked about: They were clearly setting us up for post-election conflict. I failed to realize, however, the broader implication and many clear warning signs: they are embracing, promoting and channeling conflict at every turn from the Bundy Ranch to Black Lives Matter–it’s all conflict all the time, so who cares if there are some anti-war protests in the mix? Might even be useful.
Here are a few of the other warning signs I saw and ignored, blinded by the conviction that Hillary was The Chosen One:
But the absolute crazy thing is that since May 2016 I kept saying that there would be a massive pollster fail–that we were being set up for that–then I proceeded to scratch my head as to what form it would take! Duh.
There’s one more shoe to drop, in my opinion. The Secret Service has been setting up a legacy of incompetence over the past few years that must have a purpose, so who is in the crosshairs? Could be the Obamas, could be the Clintons, could be Trump himself (though again, he is a major operation and is unlikely to be wasted), or it could mean something completely different–I’m past trying to figure out the path! But I will continue to highlight the flags and am still convinced the end goal is totalitarian world government, but hey, I could be wrong!
One final thought…no matter what happens and no matter how transparent or opaque the actors or actions may be, the only thing we can be sure of is our principles. If we keep in mind Thou Shalt Not Steal & Thou Shalt Not Kill and hold our agents in government to that standard, and if, for our own protection, we are unyielding in our defense of the Bill of Rights (perhaps citizens on the left will realize the importance of the Second Amendment et al, especially States’ Rights, now that they don’t like the man in DC!), we don’t have to know who is doing what why, we can stop them anyway–that’s why their top priority is an attack on our ability to understand and defend our principles. But even if we don’t stop them, we can go down with our souls in tact if we stick to our principles.
In preparing for The Propaganda Report, I go through my newspapers since the last episode and see what I highlighted. This week, I saw an article I had flagged about Alphabet Inc. Chairman Eric Schmidt. It seemed an innocuous enough article, though it did make the Googlaire seem both altruistic, citing his work with Timshel (more on that later), and ethical–according to “leaked emails” he recommended a competitor over his own company for a project. (Funny how the “leaked emails” can reveal how above-board and well-meaning some people are!)
Here are a few excerpts from the article:
Alphabet’s Eric Schmidt Gave Advice to Clinton Campaign, Leaked Emails Show
The executive backed a startup that helped develop some of the technology behind Mrs. Clinton’s website
Mr. Schmidt in April 2014 backed a startup dubbed Timshel that helped develop some of the technology behind Mrs. Clinton’s campaign website, including functions to sign up supporters and accept donations, according to the emails….
A Timshel spokeswoman said in an email that it develops technology “to help nonprofits, foundations, social entrepreneurs and social-impact organizations build and activate communities.”…
Mr. Schmidt suggested using Amazon Web Services as a cloud provider. Amazon.com Inc.’s cloud service is the chief rival of Google’s cloud product.
I flagged the article because I recalled having investigated Schmidt’s Deep State ties in the past. In reviewing my old research on him, I saw that he was a member of the Trilateral Commission (as was Jeffrey Epstein, the main character in this week’s episode of the Propaganda Report), and a Bilderberger, like Vernon Jordan, the subject of an article I posted this week on Jordan’s positively Orwellian pleading for Big Tech to save us from “unfiltered information.” The weird thing is
Click Here To Subscribe To The Propaganda Report On iTunes. This helps us improve our visibility. Thank you!
For Android Users,
Click Here To Subscribe To The Propaganda Report On Google Play
Convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s Lolita Express finally lands onto the news cycle, James Comey could be protecting Hillary Clinton, The dangerous divisive propaganda of identity politics, Just who’s watching the watchers, and Trump Batman Theory revisted…..all on this 9th episode of the propaganda report.
“The elites aren’t superhuman.”
“I’ve known tons of illegal immigrants who voted.”
Sandyhook footage used during the reporting of the Umpqua Community College Shooting, as mentioned. Pause it at the .16 mark and you can see the “Sandy Hook School” sign in the shot.
Fake Die Hard 5 Movie Trailer as mentioned:
On episode 8 of the Propaganda Report, we explore the short and long-range objectives behind the ongoing media psyop involving the presidential race. We only have the audio up so far, but video will be up shortly. To get the audio and video versions as soon as they’re posted, Subscribe To Brad’s Youtube Page Here.
The More Propaganda Report Podcast Subscribers We Get, The More Content We Can Produce. Getting subscribers increases our visibility, and increased visibility helps us fund our show, so please subscribe when you get a chance. Thank you!
For iTunes Users,
You can listen and subscribe here.
For Android Users,
You can listen and subscribe here.
For those who use neither, sign up and subscribe! Or, listen to this week’s episode directly, here.
This week’s podcast on youtube 🙂
This is a good time for a RedSilverJ video 🙂
I recently heard a podcast (I can’t remember which one!!) in which someone described Hillary Clinton and many others as “lifetime actors.” It took me a bit to understand fully what was meant, but I think I really got it the last time I listened to the youtube video below of Hillary audio captured long, long ago in which she chuckles about successfully defending someone she was convinced was guilty of brutally raping a 12 year old girl. I listened to it numerous times in an effort to read it any other way than what it was–aloof and cynical–but what strikes me now as significant is the fact that this Illinoisan was speaking with a clear Arkansas accent which she has since discarded. I have lived in many places and I know you soften up your homegrown way of speaking (you’d never know I’m from New York, would you??? LOL!), but she is really living this role of Southern Bell. I believe she and the rest of her stagemates in this production of The Election: A Reality Show, are all lifetime actors: people whose lives themselves are just one big act.
I covered a lot in this show but this was the highlight – note former RNC chair Michael Steele going with the flow…
I can’t help but notice there are numerous parallels between the Republicans and the Democrats this election cycle even though all anyone can say it seems is that “this never happened before”….here are a few of the parallels…
Notice any others?
Update (7/28/2016): I just thought of this one…Bernie was always a self-described “Independent” not a registered Democrat and Trump was a registered Democrat until 2009 (right after Hillary graciously conceded defeat and joined the Obama camp.)
Another parallel worthy of note is not between Bernie and Trump but between Trump and Bill Clinton. Of the handful of people in the whole country who is actually listed with Bill Clinton in convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s little black book, Hillary sure got lucky that one of them is running against her in the general election–Trump is literally the only Republican I can think of who simply could not bring up this scandal. Actually, he can’t really open up the issue of horrendous sexual allegations at all given his own history from leaving his wife and the mother of his children for a sexpot (and then leaving her for someone even hotter), to being accused of rape or attempted rape not only by his own wife but also by others such as Jill Harth and “Katie Johnson.” Though neither Bill nor The Donald have been tried and convicted on these charges, such testimony can be very damaging (just ask Bill Cosby!) and, lucky for Hillary, it would not be in Trump’s interest to pursue her “feminist” talking point’s greatest weakness: letting Bill back in the White House.