The Censorship Agenda: What To Watch Out For

In preparing for The Propaganda Report, I go through my newspapers since the last episode and see what I highlighted. This week, I saw an article I had flagged about Alphabet Inc. Chairman Eric Schmidt. It seemed an innocuous enough article, though it did make the Googlaire seem both altruistic, citing his work with Timshel (more on that later), and ethical–according to “leaked emails” he recommended a competitor over his own company for a project. (Funny how the “leaked emails” can reveal how above-board and well-meaning some people are!)

Here are a few excerpts from the article:

Alphabet’s Eric Schmidt Gave Advice to Clinton Campaign, Leaked Emails Show
The executive backed a startup that helped develop some of the technology behind Mrs. Clinton’s website

Mr. Schmidt in April 2014 backed a startup dubbed Timshel that helped develop some of the technology behind Mrs. Clinton’s campaign website, including functions to sign up supporters and accept donations, according to the emails….

A Timshel spokeswoman said in an email that it develops technology “to help nonprofits, foundations, social entrepreneurs and social-impact organizations build and activate communities.”…

Mr. Schmidt suggested using Amazon Web Services as a cloud provider. Amazon.com Inc.’s cloud service is the chief rival of Google’s cloud product.

I flagged the article because I recalled having investigated Schmidt’s Deep State ties in the past. In reviewing my old research on him, I saw that he was a member of the Trilateral Commission (as was Jeffrey Epstein, the main character in this week’s episode of the Propaganda Report), and a Bilderberger, like Vernon Jordan, the subject of an article I posted this week on Jordan’s positively Orwellian pleading for Big Tech to save us from “unfiltered information.” The weird thing is

Read moreThe Censorship Agenda: What To Watch Out For

Truthing: New Glossary Entry

101054785_Copyright_Ben_Lack_Photography_Ltd_The_family_of_murdered_MP_Jo_Cox_lay_flowers_at_the_sce-large_trans++SFXWNnhoSSUDZbpG8a9LxEljCEHhppWeqFAzBrNtD18
British MP Jo Cox’s family holding a press conference 48 hours after her assassination. You could really truth the heck out of this one!

I just coined a couple of expressions & thought I’d add them to my glossary…here’s the first…

Truthing: the habit of spending endless time and energy figuring out “what really happened” and risk playing right into “their” hands as those who are awake are totally distracted, rooting around in the rabbit hole, mesmerized into inaction as we watch the promised totalitarian technocracy descend upon us.

Granted, it is absolutely critical to realize that the mainstream media is mostly if not entirely lies and that major events garnering 24/7 news coverage are virtually never what they appear to be. Real events will have their geneses (is that the plural of genesis?) misrepresented to serve the agenda but many of the events aren’t even real. Major events you see on the news are often: provocations, blowback, false flags, hoaxes, made-up-stories, stuff “they” let happen on purpose, etc.

I believe everyone should take at least one major event (specifically a terrorist attack or mass shooting) and track down the story until every detail is supported by real evidence. Real evidence must have documentation or a named, accountable source; an eye witness whose credibility you can personally assess, etc. Perhaps it will not be possible for you to verify any information in the story–in that case, dismiss the story. The burden of proof is on the reporter to demonstrate the facts–and, by the way, the analysis and conclusion should not be part of the core story.

All that said, I have noticed lately that many of these suspicious events have shoddy official narratives and mounds of contradictory evidence, often ridiculous, of family members laughing when they should be crying, photos of suspects in police custody who later end up dead (for example, Tamerlan Tsarnaev & the San Bernardino suspect), clearly false video, etc…I can’t help but wonder why the all-powerful surveillance/propaganda state allow this stuff out there & I am beginning to conclude that the truth itself can be a time-sink and a distraction.

While half the country is glued to Fox and CNN to absorb the official narrative, the other half is surfing youtube laughing at crisis actors who cry without tears. It’s possible revealing the truth is one way they are distracting us and even laughing at us, as we see what they’re doing and are powerless to stop it.

I am not a political activist, having believed that merely exchanging ideas and helping people see through the BS would dissolve the power of the overlords, but I’m rethinking this position. Ever since Michael called from John’s Creek to say that his town adopted the International Property Maintenance Code, I realized that not only is the globalization of government being crammed down from the top, which I can’t see a way to stop, but also we are being seeded at the bottom, which I do think we can at least slow. If you have specifics of local issues & local actions we can take, write them up and I will post them on my blog, facebook and twitter. Maybe this is a resource to look to as well…

“Instantly Labeled the Panama Papers” (Propaganda Report)

ICIJ-supporters1

This is part of a series called: The Propaganda Report, Your MSM Companion. Here’s what it’s about: I read the WSJ to keep up with the official narrative–if we know what they’re trying to feed us, we might be able to figure out why. I have concluded that nothing in The Wall Street Journal, which I consider to be the “conservative” newspaper of record, is put there simply to inform. It is to misinform in order to serve an agenda or to spin real information that cannot be ignored. With that said, I thought I would take an article or related articles from The Journal (and occasionally elsewhere) every day and try to start a conversation.

For some reason, today I read The Wall Street Journal backwards. The funny thing was, that let me see where they were headed with today’s theme before I got bogged down in the set-up. Here’s what I started with–an editorial on page A12:

The Panama Papers in Perspective
The news here are the incomes and bank accounts of politicians.

That subheading didn’t appear in the print edition, so I had to read the whole article to get the punchline:

[I]t’s hard to see how the big question in this story is whether everyone with a company in Panama paid the correct amount of tax. The far more important question is how so many public officials in so many governments managed to accumulate so much money.. . . .

The mistake now would be to narrow the focus prematurely, zeroing in on tax avoidance that is a hobbyhorse of the political class but in this case is a distraction. The real news here are the incomes and far-flung bank accounts of the political class.

But not just any political class…the body of the article set up exactly whom should be in the crosshairs…

It’s no surprise that the world’s undemocratic and nontransparent regimes figure prominently in the Panama Papers. . . .

Specifically?

Read more“Instantly Labeled the Panama Papers” (Propaganda Report)

The Innocence of Oswald: Book Review

The great Dave Baker recommended to me a book written by Gary Fannin, a local author who was recently a guest on Dave’s show on WSB. The book is The Innocence of Oswald: 50+ Years of Lies, Deception & Deceit in the Murders of President John F. Kennedy & Officer JD Tippit. I could not put it down. I usually read two or three books at a time, picking them up and putting them down as the mood strikes me, but this book I read straight through from the moment I picked it up.

The Innocence of Oswald isn’t your typical 800 page JFK assassination tome laying out every last detail of political backstory. Usually those books are slogs and only end up attempting to explain that, despite all the intrigue, Oswald was a lone nut who pulled off this (literal) coup on his own and for no reason whatsoever. I have long been unconvinced by that narrative–probably since I was old enough to understand that Oswald said “I’m a patsy,” and soon after was himself assassinated while in police custody–but the truth of what exactly did happen has remained to me uncertain. I have boiled it down to the likelihood that either <<continue reading>>

The Death of Justice Scalia: A Turning Point for America

Antonin_Scalia_Official_SCOTUS_PortraitWhen my 88 year old uncle died alone in his room clearly from having gotten confused and taken more of his medicine than he was supposed to (his little am/pm pill boxes were open and empty beyond the day and time they should have been), his doctor very somberly questioned those in the family who had seen him last. The doctor felt that Uncle Al was too healthy to die suddenly, and although exhibiting early signs of dementia, should have been capable of keeping up with such a simple system to take his meds. Clearly, the doctor wanted to rule out the possibility that someone had a hand in getting Uncle Al to take too much medication. My uncle had a paranoid cast of mind and always thought people were after his money–little of it though there was–and the doctor wanted to be sure there wasn’t more to Uncle Al’s suspicions than he had credited. The reality is, there were 13,000 murders in the United States that year motivated by all sorts of things–jealousy, rage, personal gain–when someone dies, it makes sense to ask “Cui bono?” Who benefits?

When Justice Scalia died, my first thought was, “Heavy-set guy, 79, probably died of a heart attack…sounds reasonable.” I did notice that he was not at home at the time, so his wife was not with him to verify the circumstances of his death, and that he was reported as animated and well when he was last seen–aren’t there oftentimes warning signs of a heart attack? At this point, I usually get on my headlamp and start down the rabbit hole, and in this case, I might even have seen the rabbit hole in advance.

Read moreThe Death of Justice Scalia: A Turning Point for America

Seeing the Secret State

Great video (h/t AF/CF)

The patch at 42:00 explains a lot! (Let them hate, as long as they fear…could explain why “they” let us see into their power and plans!)

(BTW this is one of those videos I watch at 1.5x speed to save time–can’t do it with everything but it works here–I think he was speaking slowly for a foreign audience.)

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTVgPw7TR_k

What do Putin, the Popes, the Trans-Pacific Trade Partnership & the Afghan hospital bombing have in common?

They all cry out for world government. Here’s my take, with references underneath the video.

But there’s more than one way to skin a cat!

There’s plenty of speculation right now in the wake of simultaneous but uncoordinated military action in and around Syria between the US and Russia that we might be on the brink of World War III. After reading Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals, I stay aware that there’s always more than one way to skin a cat. Alinsky says that if things don’t go as planned, take the way they are going and use it for you. As for the move toward world government, yes, it could happen peacefully with the power elite working behind the scenes to get media, governments and institutions to sign-on in secret or under false pretenses or in response to false flags or other crises, or another path could be taken: war.

Norman Dodd, researcher for the Reece Committee, discovered that the Carnegie Endowment, in an effort to change American culture from individualist to collectivist, promoted war, specifically our involvement in World War I, as the best way to change a society. (I have often wondered if this is the way they will have to implement the “New World Order” or institute a new financial regime, as when the dollar replaced the pound as world reserve currency after World War II.) At the same time, the world wars were the primary instruments for promoting world government. World War I was used as the pretext for establishing the League of Nations and World War II for establishing the United Nations. Neither of these organizations fulfilled their creators’ dreams of having real authority (i.e., carte blanche autonomy for use of force anywhere in the world), so it might follow that as the United Nations was more successful than the League of Nations, so might a third world war bring a yet more successful world governmental organization–perhaps even one with a monopoly on the use of force.

References

Leaked tapes on Ukraine & the Deep State

Zbigniew Brzezinski’s Grand Chessboard quotes

China and the New World Order

FOX News Accidentally Shows Evidence of Syrian REBELS Using Chemical Weapons

Doctors Without Borders: Kunduz strike an ‘attack on the Geneva Conventions’

Moscow and Washington work together to restructure international relations

Pope Benedict Urges Forming New World Economic Order to Work for the ‘Common Good’

TOWARDS REFORMING THE INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL AND MONETARY SYSTEMS IN THE CONTEXT OF GLOBAL PUBLIC AUTHORITY. Vatican Council for Justice and Peace

Pope Francis calls for a new system of global government to tackle climate change (Note: The Report from Iron Mountain called for an environmental hoax to justify world government!)

UN & Obama’s Strong Cities Network form Global Police Force to Combat “Extremism” in US Cities (The Report from Iron Mountain applies here too – it suggested a global police force to unite citizens in fear and develop renewed loyalty to the nation-state! It’s like a rabbit hole within a rabbit hole!)

TPP / TTIP…The TIPPing Points: Podcast of June 13, 2015 Show

Even the much-publicized Russia-China financial pact could ultimately play right into world government. Perhaps competition from that coalition will finally “bring the US and the UK to the table” and get all the major powers to agree to a true world currency. Hegel’s old thesis-antithesis-synthesis trick! Replacing the Western Financial System BRIC by BRICS

For more on the UN, see PEACE: by the Wonderful People Who Brought You Korea & Viet Nam

Other stuff…

FT: And now for a world government…

Bill Gates: “We need a world government”

The United Nations: On the Brink of Becoming a World Government

Blue Helmets Coming To a City Near You! Please make them feel welcome 🙂

What do Putin, the Popes, the Trans-Pacific Trade Partnership & the Afghan hospital bombing have in common?

They all cry out for world government. Here’s my take, with references underneath the video.

But there’s more than one way to skin a cat!

There’s plenty of speculation right now in the wake of simultaneous but uncoordinated military action in and around Syria between the US and Russia that we might be on the brink of World War III. After reading Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals, I stay aware that there’s always more than one way to skin a cat. Alinsky says that if things don’t go as planned, take the way they are going and use it for you. As for the move toward world government, yes, it could happen peacefully with the power elite working behind the scenes to get media, governments and institutions to sign-on in secret or under false pretenses or in response to false flags or other crises, or another path could be taken: war.
Norman Dodd, researcher for the Reece Committee, discovered that the Carnegie Endowment, in an effort to change American culture from individualist to collectivist, promoted war, specifically our involvement in World War I, as the best way to change a society. (I have often wondered if this is the way they will have to implement the “New World Order” or institute a new financial regime, as when the dollar replaced the pound as world reserve currency after World War II.) At the same time, the world wars were the primary instruments for promoting world government. World War I was used as the pretext for establishing the League of Nations and World War II for establishing the United Nations. Neither of these organizations fulfilled their creators’ dreams of having real authority (i.e., carte blanche autonomy for use of force anywhere in the world), so it might follow that as the United Nations was more successful than the League of Nations, so might a third world war bring a yet more successful world governmental organization–perhaps even one with a monopoly on the use of force.

References

Leaked tapes on Ukraine & the Deep State
Zbigniew Brzezinski’s Grand Chessboard quotes
China and the New World Order
FOX News Accidentally Shows Evidence of Syrian REBELS Using Chemical Weapons
Doctors Without Borders: Kunduz strike an ‘attack on the Geneva Conventions’
Moscow and Washington work together to restructure international relations
Pope Benedict Urges Forming New World Economic Order to Work for the ‘Common Good’
TOWARDS REFORMING THE INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL AND MONETARY SYSTEMS IN THE CONTEXT OF GLOBAL PUBLIC AUTHORITY. Vatican Council for Justice and Peace
Pope Francis calls for a new system of global government to tackle climate change (Note: The Report from Iron Mountain called for an environmental hoax to justify world government!)
UN & Obama’s Strong Cities Network form Global Police Force to Combat “Extremism” in US Cities (The Report from Iron Mountain applies here too – it suggested a global police force to unite citizens in fear and develop renewed loyalty to the nation-state! It’s like a rabbit hole within a rabbit hole!)
TPP / TTIP…The TIPPing Points: Podcast of June 13, 2015 Show
Even the much-publicized Russia-China financial pact could ultimately play right into world government. Perhaps competition from that coalition will finally “bring the US and the UK to the table” and get all the major powers to agree to a true world currency. Hegel’s old thesis-antithesis-synthesis trick! Replacing the Western Financial System BRIC by BRICS
For more on the UN, see PEACE: by the Wonderful People Who Brought You Korea & Viet Nam

Other stuff…

FT: And now for a world government…
Bill Gates: “We need a world government”
The United Nations: On the Brink of Becoming a World Government
Blue Helmets Coming To a City Near You! Please make them feel welcome 🙂

Heidi Cruz wants to build a North American Community – what does that mean, exactly?

ted cruz
Rafael Edward “Ted” Cruz, with his Spanish name, Canadian birth and US citizenship, would actually be a natural candidate to be the First President of the North American Union! (n/t The Next News Network)

In today’s video preview of tomorrow’s show, I refer to a document, Building a North American Community, written by a Council on Foreign Relations task force which included Heidi Cruz (i.e., Mrs. Ted Cruz), who expressly agreed with the recommendations in the report. What are those recommendations? Here’s a sampling, but I highly recommend you read the whole text (it’s large print and only 32 pages of actual report, the rest you can skip):

  • To lay the groundwork for the freer flow of people within North America with the ultimate goal of full mobility of labor and goods across Canada, Mexico and the United States. To facilitate this, rules and regulations on labor and the environment among other things should conform across the “trinational” region. “[T]he three countries should make a concerted effort to encourage regulatory convergence…including harmonization at the highest prevailing standard…and unilateral adoption of another country’s rules.”
    • “Make a North American standard the default approach to new regulation….The new trinational mechanism also should be charged with identifying joint means of ensuring consistent enforcement of new rules as they are developed.”
  • Increase information and intelligence-sharing at the local and national levels in both law enforcement and military organizations.
    • Conduct annual training exercise to develop interoperability among and between law enforcement agencies and militaries of the US, Canada & Mexico.
  • Create a North American Border Pass with biometric identifiers.
  • Establish a North American energy and emissions regime that could offer tradable voucher systems for emissions trading.
  • Creation of a North American Advisory Council with a complementary private body “that would meet regularly or annually to buttress North American relationships, along the lines of the Bilderberg or Wehrkunde conferences, organized to support transaltantic relations.”
    • Creation of a North American Inter-Parliamentary Group that will include US Congress along with Canadian and Mexican Parliamentary representation, who play key roles in policy toward each other. The newly created North American Advisory Council (likened to the Bilderberg Group) “could provide an agenda and support for these meetings.”

Lest you think the CFR has no real influence on our government, recall this…

Update: (h/t JL) Here’s a history of and update on so-called North American “free trade” published by the Next News Network on February 18, 2016.

Update (3/31/2016): I guess we’re already doing it….

Mexico and United States Joining Forces in Maritime Security

Hot Links! (and I'm not talking BBQ!)

photoshop
This third shooting in the south recently is just too much for me to ignore, therefore, I’m going to change my plan and talk about this and a lot more tomorrow. During the show I’m going to make references people will want to check out, so here are links that will come in handy…
Earlier that same day, Obama says his one regret is not getting our guns but says he’s not giving up yet (h/t American Everyman)
Wesley Clark calls to “segregate…disloyal Americans…for the duration of the conflict.”
What is Operation Gladio?
What is Operation Mockingbird?
Terrorist Plots are often FBI Sting Operations:
Fox News
New York Times
World Trade Center Bombing ’93
ISIS IS US? and More to ISIS than meets the Eye and FOXNews reports ISIS video very fake
Syrian Chemical Weapons Attack Perpetrated by REBELS Not the Government
Using “covert means” against Iran for “crisis initiation” and “war”
CIA Chief Graham Fuller radicalizes Islam against Afghanistan, Russia & China using Dagestan & Chechnya…oh, and his daughter, fka Samanth Fuller Tsarnaev, was married to the Boston Marathon Bombers’ Uncle Ruslan…
Report from Iron Mountain (pdf)…discusses euphemized forms of slavery to control the population, creating internal enemies of minorities or other groups to keep the mainstream afraid and suggests the necessity of blood sacrifice to direct policy.
Strange details about…
Charleston
Chattanooga
Lafayette
Noah Posner (Sandy Hook victim AND Pakistani School Massacre victim!)
Lafayette shooting occurs at 7:30PM CT Thursday July 23…that’s 8:30PM ET…At 9:20PM ET Thursday July 23 New York Times reporter Liam Stack tweets a story on the incident, reporting that President Obama had been briefed on the incident en route to Africa. How did this reporter and President Obama’s advisors know w/in under an hour that this story would be national news. There are 11,000 gun homicides a year in the US…that’s 30 a day. Was Obama briefed on Todd West within an hour of his second (of seven) killings?